Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Skip auxiliary navigation (Press Enter).
Terms and Conditions
Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Student Chapter Idea Fair
Mr. Elizabeth Frick Sr.
Mr. Elizabeth Frick Sr.
List of Contributions
A review (from the Latin recensio "consideration") is a review, analysis and evaluation of a new artistic, scientific or popular scientific work; a genre of criticism, literary, newspaper and magazine publications.
The review is characterized by its small volume and brevity.
The reviewer deals first of all with new works that almost nobody has
about yet, about which a certain opinion has not been formed yet.
In the classics the reviewer discovers, above all, the possibility of its actual, acutely modern reading. Any work must be considered in the context of modern life and the modern literary process: to evaluate it as a new phenomenon. Such topicality is an indispensable feature of the review.
By essays-reviews we mean such creative works:
a small literary-critical or journalistic article (often polemical in nature), in which the work in question is an occasion for discussion of current social or literary problems;
an essay that is more of a lyrical reflection by the author of the review, inspired by the reading of the work than an interpretation of it;
an extended abstract that reveals the content of the work, the features of the composition, and at the same time contains its evaluation.
The school exam review is understood as a review - expanded abstract.
An example plan of a review of a literary work.
A bibliographic description of the work (author, title, publisher, year of publication) and a brief (in one or two sentences) retelling of its content.
A direct response to a work of literature (review-impressions).
Critical analysis or comprehensive analysis of a text:
- meaning of the title
- Analysis of form and content
- peculiarities of composition
- author's skill in portraying characters
- individual style of the writer
Argumented evaluation of the work and personal reflections of the author of the review:
- the main idea of the review
- Relevance of the theme of the work
The review does not need to have all of the above components, the main thing is that the review was interesting and competent.
Principles of reviewing.
The impulse to create a review is always the need to express your attitude to what you have read, it is an attempt to understand your impressions caused by the work, but on the basis of basic knowledge of literary
paper writing websites
, a detailed analysis of the work.
The reader can say "I like or dislike" about the book he or she has read or watched a film without proof. But the reviewer must thoroughly substantiate his or her opinion with an in-depth and reasoned analysis.
The quality of the analysis depends on the theoretical and professional training of the reviewer, his depth of understanding of the subject, the ability to analyze objectively.
The relationship between the reviewer and the author is a creative dialogue with an equal position of the parties.
The author's "self" manifests itself openly in order to influence the reader rationally, logically and emotionally. Therefore, the reviewer uses linguistic means that combine the functions of naming and evaluating, bookish and colloquial words and constructions.
Criticism does not study literature, but judges it - in order to form a reader's, public attitude toward certain writers, to actively influence the course of the literary process.
Briefly on what to keep in mind when writing a review:
A detailed retelling reduces the value of a review: first, it will not be interesting to read the work itself; second, one of the criteria for a weak review is rightly considered to be the substitution of analysis and interpretation of a text by its retelling.
Every book begins with a title, which in the process of reading you somehow interpret, unravel. The name of a good work is always polysemantic, it is a kind of symbol, a metaphor.
Much to understand and interpret the text can give an analysis of the composition. Reflecting on what compositional techniques (antithesis, ring construction, etc.) are used in the work will help the reviewer penetrate the author's intent. What parts can the text be divided into? How are they arranged?
It is important to evaluate the style and uniqueness of the writer, to analyze the images, artistic techniques that he uses in his work, and to consider what is his individual, unique style, how this author differs from others. The reviewer will take apart "how the text is made.
Copyright 2021. All rights reserved.
Powered by Higher Logic